Thread: Universal Expansion can be explained by acceleration towards a singularity

Universal Expansion can be explained by acceleration towards a singularity. The singularity needs to be spherical.

So basically if we are free fallers into a spherical singularity from the inside.

What if this spherical singularity is created by matter outside the universe as we know it. This matter might come from other big bangs around our universe. I don't know whether you have heard of dark flow but I thinks that it might be evidance that two of those 'universes' are colliding. In theory this should happen in every direction of our universe. This would explain why our universe is accelerating in a simular way as the spherical singularity.

Originally Posted by hu go

What if this spherical singularity is created by matter outside the universe as we know it. This matter might come from other big bangs around our universe. I don't know whether you have heard of dark flow but I thinks that it might be evidance that two of those 'universes' are colliding. In theory this should happen in every direction of our universe. This would explain why our universe is accelerating in a simular way as the spherical singularity.

Yes this works well with what I was thinking. But all you would need is fan out acceleration in one direction.

What exacly do you mean with fan out acceleratino in one direction?

I seem to gather that you, Tom, think that the event horizon is the singularity of a black hole....and you think that perhaps we might be inside one of these things?

well going to my theory(hypothesis thing) that a black hole is just a magnified grain of dust the mass of several stars(for big ones)---there IS no inside of the event horizon; the EH hasn't formed, I suppose you can't magnify a zero sized point, so I can't agree that the event horizon is a singularity, as I don't think there is a singularity as a point, or a sphere, but I know what you mean, as that is what I thought once.

Anyway sorry to butt in with my ATM.


what is stopping the event horizon thing, in your idea, attracting itself, and then collapsing?


here, is a thread I started back in 08, where I argue that matter can't exist inside the event horizon(when I believed in one), due to the information that made up matter not being able to move back and forth through the object and hence keep it as matter-due to needing to exceed c, in order to get out......if you see what I mean.
can matter exist inside the event horizon of a black hole?

Definitely some good points.

I am not sure I look at the universal EH is the same as Mainstream BH EH but more like a Rindler Horizon ... although I am still researching this.

The Rindler Horizon

If you assume that the universe continues to accelerate then there will be points of the universe that if you sent a signal from will never reach us.

I could agree with you however that an EH never forms. As you have seen in my posts there.

Originally Posted by Frogmarch

I seem to gather that you, Tom, think that the event horizon is the singularity of a black hole....and you think that perhaps we might be inside one of these things?

well going to my theory(hypothesis thing) that a black hole is just a magnified grain of dust the mass of several stars(for big ones)---there IS no inside of the event horizon; the EH hasn't formed, I suppose you can't magnify a zero sized point, so I can't agree that the event horizon is a singularity, as I don't think there is a singularity as a point, or a sphere, but I know what you mean, as that is what I thought once.

Anyway sorry to butt in with my ATM.


what is stopping the event horizon thing, in your idea, attracting itself, and then collapsing?


here, is a thread I started back in 08, where I argue that matter can't exist inside the event horizon(when I believed in one), due to the information that made up matter not being able to move back and forth through the object and hence keep it as matter-due to needing to exceed c, in order to get out......if you see what I mean.
can matter exist inside the event horizon of a black hole?

Imagine there wasn't only one big bang but an infinite number of big bangs. Each big bang creates a universe as we know it. Every universe is expanding and accelerating because of gravity from surounding universes. This would explain the acceleration which at the moment is explained by dark energy. This dark energy is suppost to make up 74% of mass-energy of our universe but nobody can detect it.
At some point the matter from a big bang would collide with matter from other big bangs. This area would have a very high density and therefore would attract more matter(dark flow: Dark flow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) . Eventually the region would reach almost infinite density like at the beginning of our universe. So it would produce another big bang. This would happen in all directions. A never ending moddel that would explain two unknown observations.

Originally Posted by hu go

What exacly do you mean with fan out acceleratino in one direction?

Fan out ... like a peacock from the tail to the end of the feathers.

See Particle Classification and Cosmology after reading Introduction to Quantum-Geometry Dynamics.

at which point do we reach a point of tearing? That is, things have expanded to the point where they rapidly collapse inward, then cause another big bang. Cooling happens as energy is released due to expansion. Universal cooling would cause gravity to greatly overpower the other forces as demonstrated by the collapse of a star, only this time no EH is created but everything is reduced to the singularity once more. Heat is created due to friction within the singularity which then again overpowers gravity and begins the process again. Space and Time are not one with each other. Space exists within Time. Time is the blank slate in which the heavens are painted. as Time ticks, growth and decay are the only true forces at work.