This is just bullshit. You haven't shown where any of my models are wrong (since they are consistent with basic theory), and have no ability to judge them for lack of accuracy, since you deny fundamental concepts (like the speed of light slowing down in a medium, since you have a high school understanding of what those terms mean to those who work in the field), and have no knowledge of basic physics yourself. You quote no equations, and not even any sources for your "ideas". You couldn't even express Fermat's equation correctly.

I use equations to explain physical ideas and mathematical concepts; these equations can be shown to be valid by a cursory investigation using Wikipedia - all you can do is quote questionable sources without understanding any of the mathematical of physical foundations for your misleading opinions. (I do appreciate correction of typos... I try to anticipate them, but tex equation and diagrams take some time.)

You are a pious pseudo-intellectual who pontificates about "science" but have done none of the hard work necessary to understand their foundations. If you think you have, try answering with equations, not dimly understood buzz words.

The only thing I fear is wasting time trying to explain upper division concepts of physics and math to idiots like those in the Peanut Gallery, who spam my threads by name calling without providing content in response (as I said, grapes at least tried unitil it became obvious he was trolling...)

FEAR? At the intellectual level of this forum? You gotta be kidding.....

## Bookmarks