
Originally Posted by
astrotech
How about a "Frontiers of science" forum instead of ATM?
I have a question about appeals of moderation. At BAUT the rule says if you disagree with a mod you should PM the mod or another mod. This rule is interpreted there as not allowing discussion of the mod action in the thread or any discussion of specific mod actions in public at all. Discussions have to be general. This allows the mod puppets to wade in and demand specifics and if answered by anyone including the mod puppets gives the mods an excuse to infract a member or lock the thread. This is a common tactic by mods and their puppets at BAUT to evade criticism. This is one of the pillars of the dishonesty and treachery at BAUT.
Is this how it works here?
It was my criticism at BAUT that got me banned there. I ratted out mod pzkpfw for using a sock puppet named 1100101 or whatever. I posted to toseek that I had analyzed their posting pattern and word use habits and that he could confirm it by checking their ip address. I was banned within the week. Moderator pzkpfw and his sock puppet 100110 (or whatever the hell) stopped posting that week for a month. pzkpfw came back after a month still as a mod but 100110 hasn't been back. I guess I got the right guy.
But pxkpfw is still there, he is and has always been the most agressive, dishonest, detestable mod there. Responsable for most bannings.
The mod system there is used to win flame wars not to improve discussion, educate or advance science. BAUT in my opinion now gives the most unappealing and dishonest impression of science.
There is no reason for me to contribute here is this is how it works here. The rules are not clear on this.
Looking forward to joining a science forum again but not if...
Bookmarks