Page 3 of 32 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 312
Like Tree31Likes

Thread: Watch a BAUT

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,951

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    Here's the flying car thread: Here's how you build a flying car.

    Moose is the only moderator commenting in the thread. Henrik used to be a moderator, but I don't think he was at the time of the thread. The conversation in the thread seems a little confused.

    I didn't find anything searching for "gobeldegook" or "gobbledegook". Any other suggestions there?
    You proved my point. One isn't enough, three isn't enough, a thousand wouldn't be enough. You all are hopeless.
    Lies have the stench of death and defeat.

  2. #22
    Member Azure Infinity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    37

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Well, I see no problem starting a thread specifically about reporting abuse at BAUT. I will never go there, because I've never been to BAUT. I've already been beat up enough on other forums. Why invite it?

    If you start such thread, just know that it will turn into an analysis of psychopathic/sociopathic behavior in general, and not so specific to BAUT.

    Fact is, there's tons of it out there right now, people learn to keep their mouths shut in real life but they become psycho online.

    The people you are encountering are sociopathic in the sense that they need to have power, yet aren't capable of gaining it in real life for some reason or another. They want to hurt people, ya know, crunching of bones under their heels kinda psycho...metaphorically. Again, it's all over the place.

    Yes this behavior is increasingly evident in our societies, what is the Taliban anyway?

    It's a worthy discussion. BAUT is just a tiny little 'person' with a big chip on 'his' shoulder, due to the weirdos that represent it.

    I just don't want to see you naked in the bell-tower with a high-powered rifle over it, ok?

    And Space.com apparently moved to 'facebook'. I haven't been able to find forum archives. I'd actually like to dredge up them old arguments...
    There is a remote tribe out there that worships the number zero. Is nothing sacred???

  3. #23
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,006

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    Here's the flying car thread: Here's how you build a flying car.

    Moose is the only moderator commenting in the thread. Henrik used to be a moderator, but I don't think he was at the time of the thread. The conversation in the thread seems a little confused.

    I didn't find anything searching for "gobeldegook" or "gobbledegook". Any other suggestions there?
    So far, this is the only BAUT thread we have to discuss. Let's see what happened.

    When Henrik said that your pressure calculations were ATM, he probably should have just said they were wrong. But Henrik wasn't a mod, either.

  4. #24
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,006

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Quote Originally Posted by Azure Infinity View Post
    And Space.com apparently moved to 'facebook'. I haven't been able to find forum archives. I'd actually like to dredge up them old arguments...
    I tried to login, but was stymied. I sent feedback, but haven't got a response yet.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,951

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    I tried to look up spacedotcom too. Seems they went the way of dishwater. From what you said about it that is as it should be.

    But the psycological manefestations in BAUT are interesting. The attack by the mods on the the flying car thread was just typical retaliation against me personally. I had by then raised their ire and they were attacking all my postings to make it unpleasant for me there and to warn away anyone who might be interested in responding to my posts.

    But some psycological aspects I noted. There is a phenomenon where it seems people respond to posts as if they didn't read the post or misread it. It's like some kind of optical illusion happens or cognative disonance. As when a person expects to see something they actually do see it even though it really isn't there. (not the case of the flying car. That was just an attack.) But in responding to their faulty perception of a posting they make responding posts in effect containing misquotes, misrepresentation or strawman arguments.

    At BAUT there is both honest cognative disonance and dishonest moderator misrepresentation and encouragement of cognative disonance. Of course with the obvious moderator encouragement of dishonest behavior there the dishonest behavior far excedes the honest cognative disonance at BAUT. That's why what may at times seem to be a minor misunderstanding that could have been cleared up with explanation can't be. It's really encouraged dishonest misrepresentation. It's power mongering trickery. I highly recommend members of BAUT abandon the forum. It's harming your critical thinking faculties.

    Look at the mods posts. As they have been so long using their mod power to evade criticism rather than reasoning arguments out their power of reasoning out has diminished. It's a don't use it you lose it kind of thing. Their power of reason is very dim.

    As their power of reason declines the reasons for criticism rise and their habitual use of mod power to repress criticism increases untill only non critical thinkers remain. That's why I suspect, and as many others have also pointed out, BAUT has so many aspects resembling a religeon and many other degenerate groups. They share the non critical thinking phenomenon of repression of critical thinking.

    Because they've run off the best critical thinkers the ones who remain and are eventually moved to criticise are less able to make a cogeant argument. The mods then think they're winning, that there is no good argument to be made against their dishonesty. They've fooled themselves. They've only run off the ones able to make the cogeant arguments.
    Last edited by astrotech; 01-21-2012 at 07:02 AM.
    Lies have the stench of death and defeat.

  6. #26
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,006

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Quote Originally Posted by astrotech View Post
    The attack by the mods on the the flying car thread was just typical retaliation against me personally.
    As far as I can tell, there's just one mod in that thread. I don't see any "attack", just a disagreement on particulars of your idea.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,951

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Grapes you are obviously doing what they did. Attempting to sow psycological dissonance.

    You claim that the thread was "confused" even though no reasonably intelligent person could have honestly mistaken that the flying car was a not lighter than air vehicle. Moose tried to claim that it was "heavier than a heavy air analog. When his error was pointed out he didn't acknowledge his error but just changed the subject with more faulty disputes. Henrik threw in the ATM comment to forstall dispute of his faulty claim. I didn't dispite his claims I called game over due to his cheat. When I posted game over I wanted to post tilt tilt cheater cheater game over. But even though he and the rest of the mods are cheaters calling them cheaters would have gotten me a ban.

    Because the mods sowed their attacks to confuse the thread you use that to make a claim that the thread was confused.

    You here are claiming that Henrik wasn't a mod when he did it. First you claimed you didn't know if he was now you claim he wasn't. That's false but hard to prove now that he isn't one anymore. So you sow that to cast doubt on my claim of abusive moderation. You're not fooling anyone except the ignorant and childish. But you are showing your dishonesty and trickery.

    So what was the point of this exersize? The mods did what I said they did. you responded as I said you would by sowing your thin dishonest doubt and trying to minimize what they did. No matter how many examples I supplied you would do the same. Because you have become habituated to the weak, faulty degenerate reasoning of the tactics of dishonesty and trickery.
    Last edited by astrotech; 01-21-2012 at 08:13 AM.
    Lies have the stench of death and defeat.

  8. #28
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,006

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    You here are claiming that Henrik wasn't a mod when he did it. First you claimed you didn't know if he was now you claim he wasn't. That's false but hard to prove now that he isn't one anymore. So you sow that to cast doubt on my claim of abusive moderation. You're not fooling anyone except the ignorant and childish. But you are showing your dishonesty and trickery.
    You're right, I don't know for sure when Henrik stopped being a mod.

    Still, if anyone reads the thread, Moose and Henrik just criticize your idea. Henrik was wrong to call that detail ATM, the detail was just really wrong, I don't think you were trying to rewrite physics. People make mistakes all the time, they're not trying to be against the mainstream.

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,951

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    Wrong again. Moose did not criticise my idea. He fabricated a confused post about (paraphrasing) airplanes in an unmistakable airship thread. That is what I told you before you even found the thread. Henrik posted a faulty dispute and forstalled my dispute by posting an obvious threat. He knew I would dispute his "detail". Now you appear to be trying to derail this thread with the claim that the detail he cheatingly disputed was realy wrong. I'm sure you'd like to task me with showing why his dispute was wrong. So you claim it was right even though you don't even know what my dispute is. That is to say without even hearing my side of the dispute you claim my "detail" is wrong. In effect you have not heard my review of either his dispute or your conclusion. What happened to your understanding that unreviewed conclusions are unreliable. Maybe you or he made a mistake. You did.

    So you answer this question.

    So what?

    What if I did prove multiple examples that the mods there are dishonest. So what? You wouldn't do a thing about it. You wouldn't join in on telling them "don't do that". So what is your point in denying the undeniable? I and I'm sure anyone with a clear mind reading this understands my point in illustrating this. What is your motivation if not the dishonest attempt to deny the truth? Would you be willing to objectively analyze your thinking on that thread point by point to further illustrate your faulty reasoning?

    The kind of degenerate thinking you all have encouraged over ther is really funny. One guy in that thread even asked how this flying car was to be propeled. I replied (paraphrasing) Duh, propellers. Geeze! Your posts are little better. Geeze don't you fear for the integrity of you own mind with these kind of bad habits??
    Last edited by astrotech; 01-21-2012 at 11:23 AM.
    Lies have the stench of death and defeat.

  10. #30
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,006

    Default Re: Watch a BAUT

    How would you answer Henrik about surface loading, now that you are not under their threat?

Page 3 of 32 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •