Results 21 to 30 of 108

- 09-26-2016, 11:20 AM #21

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

Doesn't refute anything, if I stipulate that you never, ever factor them into partitions....

(and thus represent independent variables, since the only common partition is then unity - a/a=1 and b/b=1

Then insert a = 1 and b = 1 into the Binomial theorem)

, but is not an integer.

This is because a and b are independent (a,b), and are therefore representable as orthogonal in two dimensions (the basis of irrational numbers being a geometric construct, mapped into the line of countable integers as an enhancement of the set of integers with a metric.... (i.e., part of the real number construct)....

For irreducible integers, a/a = b/b = 1, the relation is (1,1) for irreducible integers, providing the basis for a two dimensional vector space (and the necessity of irrational numbers not a part of the integer number line ....)Last edited by BuleriaChk; 09-26-2016 at 11:46 AM.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 09-26-2016, 11:46 AM #22
## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

- 09-26-2016, 11:50 AM #23

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

because a and b are independent (unique, irreducible) integers: changing a does not change b. This is only true if a and b have no common factors, and the only way to ensure this is to begin with a/a = and b/b = . Since a and b are independent, the two identities are the bases of a two dimensional vector space (,).

If a and b have common factors, then changing a would change b....

This is the foundation of Cartesian coordinates for real numbers (Newton proved that the Binomial Theorem holds for real numbers as well as positive integers)... Irrational numbers arise from mapping linear geometric objects (lines, areas, volumes) into the integer line; transcendental numbers (e.g. ) arise from mapping curved geometric objects (circles, ellipses, areas of... etc...) into (positive integer + irrational) line. etc., etc.....Last edited by BuleriaChk; 09-26-2016 at 12:03 PM.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 09-26-2016, 01:08 PM #24
## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

- 09-26-2016, 01:23 PM #25

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

(I know you didn't ask "that", but they are questions you should be asking, so you won't have to ask the one you just did ...)

(over, and over, and over, and over, and.....)

c cannot be an integer**if a and b are positive integers in Fermat's equation for n > 2.**

Fermat's equation = (?)**for a,b,c,n positive integers, n > 2**

Answer: "No"Last edited by BuleriaChk; 09-26-2016 at 01:33 PM.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 09-26-2016, 01:38 PM #26
## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

- 09-26-2016, 01:55 PM #27

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 09-26-2016, 02:01 PM #28
## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

- 09-26-2016, 03:00 PM #29

- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Posts
- 1,074

## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

Has anyone else seen your "proof"? I'm totally lost by your language. The mathematical terms are all there, but there's something bizarre about the way the sentence comes out. Is there a pdf of the "proof" from start to finish, preferably without the physics (being a number-theoretic question and all)?

- 09-26-2016, 03:02 PM #30

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

## Bookmarks