Results 31 to 36 of 36

- 12-26-2016, 07:35 PM #31
## Re: Proof of Fermat's Theorem by Modulus

- 02-27-2017, 12:38 AM #32

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Proof of Fermat's Theorem by Modulus

Last edited by BuleriaChk; 02-27-2017 at 12:46 AM.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 02-27-2017, 02:30 AM #33

- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 564

- 02-27-2017, 06:37 AM #34
## Re: Proof of Fermat's Theorem by Modulus

You claimed that c

^{n}didn't equal a^{n}+b^{n}, for all positive numbers

I gave you an example that showed you were wrong

You are confusing the two things. Yes, if c=a+b, then c^{n}cannot equal a^{n}+b^{n}, that's obvious. But c^{n}could equal a^{n}+b^{n}for some a and b--and that's why your "proof" doesn't work.

- 02-27-2017, 09:38 AM #35

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Proof of Fermat's Theorem by Modulus

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 02-27-2017, 10:20 AM #36
## Re: Proof of Fermat's Theorem by Modulus

The Right Hand Side would be a single integer, but that single integer is represented as being the sum of two other integers, b and c

This is a two month old thread, the same subject is treated in anothe thread:

Fermat's Theorem, Relativity, Quantum Field Theory

This thread is closed.

Last edited by grapes; 02-27-2017 at 10:39 AM.

## Bookmarks