The physics interpretation of Relativity may be irrelevant in your mind (since you may not exist), but the pure mathematics is not with respect to counting mental widgets where each widget represents the final state of an imagined widget creation process.

The RUC defines sine and cosine w.r.t. the final state, and is therefore fundamental to, uh, trigonometry, which may be a new mathematical discipline for you.

The Binomial Expansion then refers to, uh, binomials, which again may be a new mathematical discipline for you. Not to mention integer multiplication in addition to, uh, addition ...

(As opposed to the constructivist perspective in one dimension, where there is only one type of widget that doesn't interact with anything else (since no other types of widget exists)

(note: elliptic functions (as all functions) require (at least) two dimensions - two different types of widgets).

STR together with the Binomial Expansion covers all widget interactions for the case in which there are only two types of widgets. This can be expanded by the Euler conjecture to include any number of different types of widgets and any number of interactions in a polynomial expansion - computer model not withstanding, depending on the computer and the model).

But, hey, if you maintain that there is only one ring (i.e., final state), at least you can't be accused of bigamy, since you're only married to yourself ...

The proposition "There is only one type of mental widget in its final state, and that type of mental widget is me" is the ultimate self-referral sentence.

.

## Bookmarks