Page 18 of 20 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 200
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: Fermat's last, and mine too.

  1. #171
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Doesn't invalidate the proof at all. The proof specifies n>2.

    The dot product is only valid for for the Pythagorean triple.
    The dot product is *always* zero, no matter which positives integers a and b are, whether they are a part of a Pythagorean triple or not. You just can't do what you think you're doing. Your "proof" is invalid.
    It is NOT valid for terms in rem(a,b,n) for n>2 Consider the case n=3, which has terms like and



    In the terms containing products of a and b ( ), and , are NEVER orthogonal, and rem(a,b,3) only vanishes if a = 0 or b= 0.

    (the terms only intersect at (0,0).

    Village idiot...

  2. #172
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    The dot product is *always* zero, no matter which positives integers a and b are, whether they are a part of a Pythagorean triple or not. You just can't do what you think you're doing. Your "proof" is invalid.
    The dot product applies to Pythagorean triples for the case n=2. NOT for n>2 in the context of positive integers. If the vectors are not orthogonal in two dimensions the plane (a,b) or (x,y), then the dot product is not zero, since



    It actually applies to all real numbers in a two dimensional Cartesian coordinate system, of which Pythagorean triples are a sublset.

    as in the case n=2 only if

    You're not only a Village Idiot, you're a Continental Idiot.

    Try to get a refund from the school that taught you advanced math. Or even beginning math.

    Hint: still reside on the (x,y) axes...

    (Anyone not in the Peanut Gallery must be laughing their asses off).
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 03-19-2017 at 12:07 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  3. #173
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Village idiot...

    _______________
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/17/2017 9:28 PM PST
    The pdf at that link in your signature still contains your erroneous "proofs". On the first page it says:
    03./05/2017 07:05 AM PST Case n=2 dot product

    It is important to understand that the Pythagorean Theorem means that the two legs of the right triangle and are orthogonal, so that For the Binomial Expansion, this means that
    No, for positive numbers, is never equal to zero in the Binomial Expansion, is *never* equal to your

  4. #174
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    The pdf at that link in your signature still contains your erroneous "proofs". On the first page it says:

    No, for positive numbers, is never equal to zero in the Binomial Expansion, is *never* equal to your
    The context is clear (well, ok, probably not to you); I am comparing the Pythagorean Triangle to the Binomial Expansion, not equating them.

    Doesn't invalidate my proof, in any case (n>2)

    (If Dr. Wiles contacts me about it, I might go back and clarify it...
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 03-19-2017 at 12:54 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  5. #175
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    The context is clear (well, ok, probably not to you); I am comparing the Pythagorean Triangle to the Binomial Expansion, not equating them.
    I'm just complaining about the equals signs. Your *equations* are wrong.
    Doesn't invalidate my proof, in any case (n>2)
    Of course it invalidates your "proof". For *any* solution to , n>1, c must be less than a+b. You never consider c<a+b, which is why your "proof" is so short--you've ignored the difficult part!
    (If Dr. Wiles contacts me about it, I might go back and clarify it...
    If you leave bonehead errors on the first page (or any page) you'll never get that chance.

  6. #176
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    I'm just complaining about the equals signs. Your *equations* are wrong.

    Of course it invalidates your "proof". For *any* solution to , n>1, c must be less than a+b. You never consider c<a+b, which is why your "proof" is so short--you've ignored the difficult part!

    If you leave bonehead errors on the first page (or any page) you'll never get that chance.
    Nah, I've presented the proof in so many other places in my pdf and on this forum, that the context is clear, and I don't consider any elements a,b,c that are not in vector format (which is implicitly understood in the context of my proof).


    In the pdf quote you left out the context of the full sentence "... (orthogonal symbol) in the pair (a,b)" which automatically refers to the expression as a vector expression in Cartesian space You deliberately misquoted me out of context. Shame on you. You did not quote the full sentence. Despicable.

    If you can't understand that the vector format is implicitly understood, then you're going to keep on being a village idiot, and your complaints are completely irrelevant to my proof. I am writing a lot of material that I am not posting directly to this forum, and I have no time for idiots that can't understand that in the context of the proof I am always talking about vectors. From the very start.

    The Peanut Gallery is the only echo chamber that does not seem to understand this. Fricken' Village Idiots.
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 03-19-2017 at 02:09 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  7. #177
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Nah, I've presented the proof in so many other places in my pdf and on this forum, that the context is clear, and I don't consider any elements a,b,c that are not in vector format (which is implicitly understood in the context of my proof).


    In the pdf quote you left out the context of the full sentence "... (orthogonal symbol) in the pair (a,b)" which automatically refers to the expression as a vector expression in Cartesian space You deliberately misquoted me out of context. Shame on you. You did not quote the full sentence. Despicable.
    No, it was there:
    Quote Originally Posted by grapes
    03./05/2017 07:05 AM PST Case n=2 dot product

    It is important to understand that the Pythagorean Theorem means that the two legs of the right triangle a and b are orthogonal, so that For the Binomial Expansion, this means that
    Again, I was just pointing out places where you claimed two expressions were equal, but it's easily shown that they're not equal. I don't care if you think you're justified in messing up the notation. If you ever cleaned up the notation, it'd be even more obvious that your "proof" is riddled with errors and misconceptions.

  8. #178
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    No, it was there:

    Again, I was just pointing out places where you claimed two expressions were equal, but it's easily shown that they're not equal. I don't care if you think you're justified in messing up the notation. If you ever cleaned up the notation, it'd be even more obvious that your "proof" is riddled with errors and misconceptions.
    (minor edit of mine to clarify "comparision" which is totally unnecessary: Grapes omitted " in the pair (a,b)." which emphasizes the vector nature of the expression so my minor edit was unnecessary.

    "It is important to understand that the Pythagorean Theorem means that the two legs of the right triangle and are orthogonal, so that For the Binomial Expansion, this means that comparing the Pythagorean triangle with the Binomial Expansion , in the pair (a,b)."


    Fricken despicable Village Idiot, braying "hee haw" from the echo chamber of the Peanut Gallery.
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 03-19-2017 at 05:33 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  9. #179
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Added a section for Astrophysicists to the FLT proof 03/19/2017 3:09 PM PST
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  10. #180
    Moderator grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    (minor edit of mine to clarify "comparision" which is totally unnecessary: Grapes omitted " in the pair (a,b)." which emphasizes the vector nature of the expression so my minor edit was unnecessary.

    "It is important to understand that the Pythagorean Theorem means that the two legs of the right triangle and are orthogonal, so that For the Binomial Expansion, this means that comparing the Pythagorean triangle with the Binomial Expansion , in the pair (a,b)."


    Fricken despicable Village Idiot, braying "hee haw" from the echo chamber of the Peanut Gallery.
    So, your pdf repeats the same thing in the space of three lines, I leave off one of the repetitions and you complain I took the whole thing out of context because of it? C'mon

Page 18 of 20 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •