Results 11 to 20 of 208

- 02-27-2017, 03:23 AM #11
## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Welcome to the discussion board. Once a posters post count passes a certain limit, the software allows links to be posted. That is set in place to reduce Spam.

I took the liberty of adding the link to your post for clarity.--Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--

“Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

"When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

- 02-27-2017, 11:10 AM #12

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,768

## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 02-28-2017, 12:19 AM #13

- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 4

- 02-28-2017, 12:24 AM #14

- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 4

- 02-28-2017, 01:11 AM #15

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,768

## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 02-28-2017, 01:39 AM #16

- 02-28-2017, 02:31 AM #17

- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 565

## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Look up the word "non-sense", reductio ad absurdum means you assume someone and then show it leads to a contradiction.

Not that you

1: Assume something for a theorem that goes in opposition to what the theorem requires to be applicable. I cannot use pythagorean theorem while assuming that none of the angles in the fucking triangle is 90 degrees.

2: Mix a bunch of concepts in the hopes it'll confuse people because most here, unlike you, know the differens between things. Many things, such as integers, are expressable in many ways. However a vector, is not one of them. Because it requires that for an integer n that pi*n is an integer which is ludacris.

- 02-28-2017, 05:56 AM #18

- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 4

- 02-28-2017, 06:58 AM #19

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,768

## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

I'm only going to answer this once in my threads.

The connection between integer counting and the Binomial Theorem is through relativistic spin (Special Theory of Relativity).

Pure mathematics involves imaginary widgets. It requires energy and momentum to actually create a widget. Newton and Maxwell did not address this. Einstein (and Pauli/Dirac) did address the issue.

If you haven't geen on the journey I have to understand the Lorentz Transform, the Pauli/Dirac formulation, and relativistic spin (QFT, there is no point in going further; I am beginning to see a way to draw a diagram for this, and I will shortly be presenting my case at UCSB. Until then, if you haven't understood the Relativistic Unit Circle and the links to the Pauli/Dirac matrices, there is no point in carrying the discussion further._______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 02-28-2017, 07:18 AM #20
## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

--Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--

“Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

"When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

## Bookmarks