# Thread: Fermat's last, and mine too.

1. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by BuleriaChk

The connection between integer counting and the Binomial Theorem is through relativistic spin (Special Theory of Relativity).

Pure mathematics involves imaginary widgets. It requires energy and momentum to actually create a widget. Newton and Maxwell did not address this. Einstein (and Pauli/Dirac) did address the issue.

If you haven't geen on the journey I have to understand the Lorentz Transform, the Pauli/Dirac formulation, and relativistic spin (QFT, there is no point in going further; I am beginning to see a way to draw a diagram for this, and I will shortly be presenting my case at UCSB. Until then, if you haven't understood the Relativistic Unit Circle and the links to the Pauli/Dirac matrices, there is no point in carrying the discussion further.
My god you moron! You cannot use physics to describe things in mathematics, that is because everything in physics is described using MATHEMATICS!

My god you get even the arrow of description wrong!

2. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by Neverfly
Define: "Widget."

...Like that you think you can apply the Time Dilation equation to a Photon?
I would like to know what "energy" and "momentum" even fucking means in mathematics, those are physics concepts not mathematics so they are not applicable in mathematics.

3. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by emperorzelos
I would like to know what "energy" and "momentum" even fucking means in mathematics, those are physics concepts not mathematics so they are not applicable in mathematics.
Yes, Mathematics is the language used to model physics, but physics is not used to model Mathematics.

4. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by Neverfly
Yes, Mathematics is the language used to model physics, but physics is not used to model Mathematics.
Exactly my point, so what the hell does he even mean when he talks about those things as this is a mathematics discussion!

5. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by emperorzelos
Exactly my point, so what the hell does he even mean when he talks about those things as this is a mathematics discussion!
I really think it is a case of "Forty-Seven." He believes he has found a fundamental pattern (in the binomial theorem) in nature that extends to all fields and he is now trying to literally tie it into all scientific theory to make a Grand Unified Binomial Theory out of it.

6. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Documents updated to include discussion of relation to Foundations of Mathematics, STR, Goedel's Theorem and, or course Fermat.

7. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Op is AstroTech,
Fermat's Theorem, Relativity, Quantum Field Theory

Proof of Fermat's Theorem using vectors

The Relativistic Unit Circle

Fermat's Theorem revisited, and my "mistake".

Dimensions, sets, and Fermat's Theorem

Fermat's Theroem and the Relativistic Unit Circle

If BuleriaChk wishes to discuss his Fermats last Theorem/Relativistic Circle/Pauli whatever he calls it; he may do so here.
Any attempt by BuleriaChk to seize Control over the board by creating new threads for his claims will be closed and redirected here.

8. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Big red fight words moved to Cage Match. - NF
He bloated my threads with irrelevant comments and misconceived ideas. Anyone with any decent scientific education reading my technical responses will understand me.

9. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by BuleriaChk
He bloated my threads with irrelevant comments and misconceived ideas. Anyone with any decent scientific education reading my technical responses will understand me.
For example, Grapes?
Anyone with an education or scientific understanding reading your comments can see that you have a lot of misconceptions and a total unwillingness to correct them.

I don't care how despicable you think I am. You have been expressing outrage toward anyone who does not "kiss your ass and faun over your genius" and that posts in any thread you start.

If you want to discuss your FLT claims, you can do it in ONE thread without claiming ownership of it. Without claiming you may "kick all other members" out of the thread. You have told each and every poster on the board to "get the fuck out of your thread." You have been beyond abusive to others and have contributed heavily to the loss of membership and lack of activity.

10. ## Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

Originally Posted by Neverfly
For example, Grapes?
Anyone with an education or scientific understanding reading your comments can see that you have a lot of misconceptions and a total unwillingness to correct them.

I don't care how despicable you think I am. You have been expressing outrage toward anyone who does not "kiss your ass and faun over your genius" and that posts in any thread you start.
No, just you, the Naked Emperor, and Grapes when he brays "nonsense". And that other new guy.
I don't ask ANYONE to "kiss my ass and faun over my genius"; that is your interpretation as a singularly unqualified person to judge my work.

I never attack first....

And I have finally answered Grapes question about "c = a + b", because I think he may now know the difference between an integer and a binomial. Do you?

(I didn't think so)...

Mostly, though, it is you who post nonsense in my threads.

Page 3 of 21 First 1234513 ... Last

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•