Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: BuleriaChk vs. Neverfly

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    563

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    To the reader: Please read my Ignore List in my signature.
    Translation

    waaaahh waaahh waaaaahhhhh I CAN'T STAND THEM SHOWING HOW STUPID THEY ARE! MUMMY! THEY ARE BEING MEAN TO ME!

  2. #12
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,779

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    The difference between making claims and using the scientific method is in that using the scientific method requires the presentation of independently verifiable evidence.
    BuleriaChk, you have a habit of making Claims. Ad Hom claims against anyone that argues against your assertions on Math and Physics.
    Not only do you not support any denial you make of their rebuttals, you refuse to even support your Ad Hominem claims against those members.
    In life... we often find ourselves ultimately powerless to do anything about people that live in a delusional state.

    Well, since you have incessantly whined and cried and thrown major fits over the fact that the title "Moderator" (Janitor) is next to my name, I figure if I am going to be accused of the crime, I may as well do the time.
    I cannot count on both hands and feet how many times you have asserted that I could not present Fermats Last Theorem correctly. Now, that alone does not really bother me... But what does bother me is that pattern of repeat behavior: Every single member who has pointed out a flaw in your logic, an error in your mathematics or your misunderstandings of physics has gotten nothing but derision, insults, derogatory comments from you: In short when confronted for being wrong, you always attack the person.
    So, I am focusing on that one simple attack of yours. Put up the evidence. Show the quote where I incorrectly presented FLT. You have had a full three days to find it.
    Odds are that you will try to weasel your way out of it, refuse to do it, throw a major fit that I banned you for three days and I don't even care. If you take that option, I do not care if you leave the forum permanently. It will not suffer one bit without your delusional denials and back and forth weaseling. And it certainly won't suffer from lacking your nonstop Ad Hom attacks on anyone that has the audacity to point out that you are Wrong.

    Go get yourself another Parking Ticket stalking professors.
    emperorzelos likes this.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Fermat's Theorem - To Whom It May Concern

    I tried to send this as a private message to Tom, but it didn't go thru, so I'll post it here.
    ---------------------
    I was recently banned by Neverfly from the forum for addressing his ridiculous and ignorant claims about the nature of "c" (whatever that means; apparently not either the speed of the rate of mass creation of light according to him)

    Neverfly should never be made a moderator. He knows very little of mainstream physics, and is quick to jump in when he doesn't understand anything involving equations, and has no concept of the underlying principles of calculus, linear algebra.

    John Gabriel, on the other hand, was addressing fundamentally a very significant issue - the relation of curvature to dimension (or lack of it). Tom asked a fundamental question about division by zero, and I pointed out that such an operation is not defined. I believe I answered the question clearly.

    Nevertheless, there are many difficult philosophical ideas underlying physics, especially in the non-Newtonian world where light does interact with matter. Neverfly has no concept of these worlds.

    I have put up with meaningless spam without intellectual context enough. This will be my last post to the forum unless this situation is rectified. It is disgusting to have someone like Neverfly with the power to ban members who he doesn't understand (and, trust me, Neverfly has NEVER understood anything I have said.) Like John Gabriel, I will pursue my interests elsewhere.

    I have always tried to answer serious questions when they were not simple spam and name-calling, e.g. "that's bullshit", or "you don't know what you're talking about" without further context. (I try to avoid those phrases myself, and never instigate them, only responding in kind after a number of responses.)

    Neverfly is ignorant, and disses any physical or mathematial concept he doesn't understand. His quote of Tyson in his signature is hypocritical, since he bans those with any scientific training that challenge his high school prejudices.

    In any case, for those of you who want to try to solve Fermat's theorem for yourselves, you can continue the discussion with Grapes ...

    Tom - I do appreciate the forum. Having had to write about various concepts (the relativity unit circle, the Pauli equations as the foundation of my proof of Fermat's theorems, and the introduction of quaternions in my last post) have shown me the way to Dirac and the foundation of anti-matter (electrons and holes in a superficial analysis). So my best to you and others that provided intelligent responses for the most part: JDoolin in particular early on when I was struggling with the Lorentz transform...

    I tried to write you privately about this, but for some reason it wouldn't go through. To you, and others seriously engaged in pursuit of understanding, my best to you in your intellectual travels.
    If you want to contact me about this, you have my email address, or can find it on my Website.

    Otherwise, "Hasta La Vista, Baby"...

    Chuck
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    563

    Default Re: Fermat's Theorem - To Whom It May Concern

    You were banned most likely for making unwarrented unsubstantiated claims that you cannot back up and doing this only demonstrates your juvenile mentality.

  5. #15
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,779

    Default Re: Fermat's Theorem - To Whom It May Concern

    Chuck, you were banned once, for all of three days. Primarily due to your Intellectual Dishonesty and secondly due to your constant and consistent derision and insults.
    The only hypocrisy is your delusional denial of the physics you reject and do not understand, as you project your behavior onto others.
    This forum will not suffer your loss, Chuck.
    It may be quieter for a little while... but it's a quiet I, for one, can live with.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  6. #16
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,779

    Default Re: Fermat's Theorem - To Whom It May Concern

    Removed from Fermats Last Theorem Revisited thread:
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Since grapes (a village idiot moderator) has closed my original thread (snip)
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    By "we" you mean yourself and the other two village idiots in the Peanut Gallery...
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Village idiot.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Time will tell; I'm finally making contacts at the university. But you will always remain a village idiot. Along with the rest of the Peanut Gallery.
    Others are reading this, and you are on record... Good luck with that....

    I'm sure you don't understand the "rest of the proof", since you don't understand trigonometry.

    And you still bray "nonsense" like a dumb jackass....

    and you're still a despicable moderator who keeps trying to silence me.... by deluging my threads with repetitive spam, if not closing them outright.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    (I just included "c = a+b" to confuse village idiots like you, who don't understand vectors and independent variables)
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    A charter member of the Peanut Gallery...

    Except by bending and kissing the ass of conventional wisdom, since that's your "authority" ....
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    You are doing that lying thing you always resort to whenever you get backed into a corner.
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    No, the authority is that mathematics is consistent even when a fool tries to play it off that he discovered a grand scam conspiracy to cover up how easy it is to Prove FLT for over three hundred years...

    Yes, all those centuries were full of buffoons and Charter Members of the Peanut Gallery until BuleriaChk came along and showed us how dumb we all really are. -sarcasm-
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post

    Village Idiot... shouting in the echo chamber of the Peanut Gallery... exchanging "ideas" (and I use the word loosely) among all three of you...

    Tine will tell.... keep braying if you think it will help your cause and increase your credibility (about being a donkey, that is...)
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    The lack of understanding is on your end, as you slither further into your delusional denial.
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    You lie like a dog. At least Gabriel was deluded but Honest. You're dishonest. Not just to others but even with yourself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    The one braying is you as you run circus side show distractions every time you get rebutted, braying about village idiots, braying with excuses when you screw up the math, braying that no one understands your proof, braying about how it's all irrelevant whenever you can't get away with denying your errors or flaws, braying about how it's all a centuries long conspiracy that managed to silence every single generation of independent free-thinking mathematicians...
    And worst of it all... Lying beginning, middle and end of it.
    The braying jackass is in your mirror.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    What flaws? (quote my pdf)... I call bullshit... Shut the fuck up if you can't be specific.

    You have no idea what you are talking about. You've only posted drivel.
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    I was very specific. Your "proof" fails to meet the rigorous standard of proving that the claim is consistently and always valid.
    Not only are you being dishonest in pretending that I was not... you are ordering forum members to "shut the fuck up."
    This from the guy that claims he should have the right to ban members from refuting his arguments in any thread he starts.
    Last edited by Neverfly; 01-05-2017 at 08:29 AM.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,761

    Default Re: Fermat's Theorem, Revistited

    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    In order to clean up this thread, removing whole posts to the Cage Match would have made the thread very difficult to follow. Instead, material was edited out of the offending posts while the On Topic content remains and the vulgarity, ad homs and insults were moved to here.

    If you wish to continue the personal attacks in that thread, we can. In this thread, we should try to stay on topic without them.
    Then stop using words like "nonsense", "dishonesty", "argument from authority", "shit against the wall", etc. and actually address the issues in my proof.

    Which ultimately boils down to an accepetance of the Cartesian (or radial) coordinate system of two indepedent variables (x,t) or (r,).

    I notice in Wiles' "proof" that he uses elliptical curves, which presupposes two dimensions, but he doesn't mention an origin, or a metric relative to the origin for distinguishable particles (elements). This is the same mistake John Gabriel made in his "new derivative" - he actually tried to define it without a limit, but the definition was flawed because of his characterization of the slope. He was trying to define it algebraically, by ignoring the necessity that the triangle formed by the slope be connected.

    I find the concept of "modules" (as far as I understand them) to be suspect, in the sense that they do not clearly distinguish the particles (i.e., integers); the unit integers are fundamental to the expressions of Pauli and Dirac, and is why they are so important. The Binomial Theorem (and Fermat's Theorem) is true because the lhs of the equation will either be irrational ( function of ) in Cartesian coordinates or a function of in radial coordinates. It is the same problem that Einstein ran into when trying to formulate a globally covariant model of the universe - and it fundamentally comes down to trying to square the cirrcle.

    By parameteriazing the two coordinates (ct,vt') one has in STR a method of addressing all such partcles in the relativistic unit circle, which shows that two dimenions are required for counting them (a,b). In the Binomial Theorem, the only way Rem(a,b,n) can vanish is if a = 0 or b=0, which is verfied by the STR model (and codified in QFT by the Pauli/Dirac formulation.

    Vectors are used to distinguish number lines in two dimensions. Wiles' invokes a curve, but (as far as I can tell) uses "modules" instead of vectors, which I suspect are the same thing in the final analysis IF his proof is correct. One key issue is if his proof holds up in a coordinate transformation from radial to Cartesian coordinates.

    In short, by ignoring vectors, the "mathematical" sect is trying to promote a religion that has no foundation at an origin (0,0) by completely ignoring its existence, but then invoking "curves" - At least John Gabriel was honest in trying to reject them.... curves require two dimensions.

    So Wiles invokes curves without invoking dimensions. No wonder Fermat's theorem is hard to prove for him, where if one accepts dimensions (and standard algebra), the proof is obvious and direct from the Binomial Expansion.

    Mathematicians such as this remind me of magicians (or gurus), trying to use arcane symbols and concepts to mask the obvious analysis staring them in the faces. (Don't ever, EVER hire such a person to design a bridge.... But the religion ignores the concept of independent (distinguishable) variables expressed in an obvious way by vectors, and waves its hand over the blackboard with ever more arcane exotic scribbles - and if you believe it it is your mental process, with "you" masquerading as god (as a unit integer).

    Both Neverfly and grapes are extraorinarily unethical moderators. Neverfly quotes Tyson (a physicist) in his signature, but has no understanding of the vector foundation of physics (e.g., the vector potential, so fundamental to quantum electrodynamics). He can barely write a (wrong) wave equation. Grapes doesn't admit vectors at all, in his expression "c < (a+b)"; he doesn't realize that such an expression is the same as "1 < 1" in a single dimension because both expressions refer to the same unique number.

    And both of them howl "nonsense" or any number of other perjoritives trying to misdirect attention from the actual issues involved: "Is a coordinate system in two dimensions required - including a metric and an origin" to characterize curves, and is there a difference between a square and a circle?

    Anyone who has been through an analyisis of concepts such as the application of Poisson brackets to generalized coordinates, and their significance in quantum mechanics will understand this distinction.

    Religious fanatics who can only count in one dimension will never grasp the issue, and so retreat into braying "nonsense" when faced with such a proof (from the Binomial Theorem). And yet these same religious fanatics use computers that are built from quantum physics (matter/antimatter) in semiconductor physics... Talk about the Taliban...

    But if you're NOT going to accept two dimensions (a,b) and all you can do is howl at those who do, be aware that such inane howling isn't going to convince those of us that understand linear algebra.... (or signal processing and analysis, or physics since Newton).

    So just stay out of my threads with that sort of insulting and irrelevant spam and start your own to defend your position of curves in one dimension (by using quasi religious mumbo jumbo such as "modules" or "Dedkind cuts").... and good luck with that....

    But this interaction has made clear to me the fundamental issues involved, and the insane lengths "one dimension" mathematicians will go to defend their indefensible positiion.

    (The whole point of the proof by Binomial Theorem AND relativistic unit circle is that they are valid in all coordinate systems. The Binomial theorem because it automatically assumes them in preserving the symbols for a and b in the Expansion, and the RUC by explicitly invoking them by comparing and with refernce to the circle.)

    Villlage Idiot moderators who can't stand the heat when it forces them to stifle dissent and howl when the concepts get too difficult for them. Tyson would be SO embarrased if he knew you referenced him in your signature...
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 01-05-2017 at 11:10 AM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle Updates 03/02/2017 12:07 PM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  8. #18
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,779

    Default Re: Fermat's Theorem, Revistited

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Villlage Idiot moderators who can't stand the heat when it forces them to stifle dissent and howl when the concepts get too difficult for them. Tyson would be SO embarrased if he knew you referenced him in your signature...
    No one is stifling dissent, at all. I even preserved your posts in a publicly view-able thread. No one is howling about difficult concepts but YOU.


    But... Since you want to claim that the mods here are Unethical and Stifle you over and over and over and over again without cause... In spite of THOUSANDS of posts which you have made, in spite of the record of endless debates and tolerance of your constant Derision and Insults... I think your neverending LYING is a good reason to Justify your Claims of Mean Moderators.
    Take a break.
    Last edited by Neverfly; 01-05-2017 at 11:32 AM.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  9. #19
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,779

    Default Re: Fermat's Theorem, Revistited

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    You closed my thread, you fucking asshole. My thread was about Fermat's Theorem, Relativity, and Quantum Field theory, not your ridiculous, juvenile concepts of physics.

    With my original work, even if you don't understand it.

    And Grapes was just beginning to understand it.

    You are fucking despicable.
    And some more:

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Neverfly is a despicable ass hole, not allowing me to create my own threads and spamming them incessantly with arrogant stupidity.

    MY THREADS ARE MY ORIGINAL WORK, NOT ASTROTECH'S. AND CERTAINLY NOT NEVERFLY'S.

    He has closed all my threads and placed them under Astrotech's name. He is simply despicable.

    And if Astrotech agreed to this, he is included...

    Eventually the world will know....

    I never wanted to seize control of the board, I just wanted Neverfly out of my threads, since he contributes nothing to them - and doesn't even try to understand them.

    He bloated my threads with irrelevant comments and misconceived ideas. Anyone with any decent scientific education reading my technical responses will understand me.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  10. #20
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,779

    Default Re: BuleriaChk vs. Neverfly

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    He has closed all my threads and placed them under Astrotech's name. He is simply despicable.

    And if Astrotech agreed to this, he is included...
    Astrotech was not involved. Originally, I was going to make a new thread, using my own name. However, since a thread already exist on the topic that was not started by you, it was logical to use it, instead.

    BuleriaChk, you have told every single active poster on the board to "get out" of your threads after they critically analyze your posts.
    You are acting as though you believe that you have exclusive rights to threads. You do not. Moving the topic to a thread with a different member as the Original Poster and closing the ones started by you is an effort to get you to let go of the belief that you can order people into silence and dictate who may or may not post on a Free Exchange of Ideas: A Forum.

    Consider How Long It Took before this action was taken.

    You have been ordering people to get the fuck out of "your" threads for Many Months!!!
    This is not an act of oppression but one of desperation. What is it that you want? Why do you post the topics and open the discussion if you are just going to angrily yell at people to "get the fuck out?" What do you WANT out of having the open ability to discuss a topic?
    How many posters on here are telling others to "Just shut up!" Or to "Get the fuck out"? Jason_Me has said similar a couple of times, but he's not been repeatedly and consistently delivering it as an order. Rather he has been voicing it as his own personal frustration a couple of times. He's not being banned, having threads closed... because he's not taken it anywhere near as far as you have. And no one else has been doing it lately.
    So don't pull the sympathy card. You're not being mistreated.
    emperorzelos likes this.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •