Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: BuleriaChk vs. Neverfly

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: BuleriaChk vs. Neverfly

    I have to say I do like them being merged and such, it's really just the same thing over and over again and you do not need multiple threads for it

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,766

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    No, you will just lump them into the "Peanut Gallery." As you have demonstrated. John Gabriel drove off most of the board membership long ago. What remains is quite small, but even so, two new members DID come across your threads on a google search and they DID join up to tell you the flaws in your "Proof" and you immediately cut them into the "Peanut Gallery."
    I don't believe there is a person on this planet that you would listen to unless they said you were "right" even if they could not explain how you were "right."

    You said you are 73 years old. Just how old is your Old Boss?
    I've attended graduate school at UCSB and worked for years in the industry. I'm still in good standing if I ever decided to go back.... (but very expensive these days...)

    I've been around bright people. The Peanut Gallery is definitely not. And I was the one who finally showed why John Gabriel's "new derivative" was inconsistent with the concept of slope and curvature ... None of the rest of you had a clue....

    Neither of the two to which you refer were answering to my proof, they were answering to their own preconceptions. You yourself are a fraud, and incompetent analyst with only the minimum knowledge of physics for sociologists, as is obvious from your responses.
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 03-06-2017 at 09:19 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle 03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  3. #23
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    I've been around bright people.
    I've been around Elephants. That doesn't make me an elephant.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    And I was the one who finally showed why John Gabriel's "new derivative" was inconsistent with the concept of slope and curvature ... None of the rest of you had a clue....
    No, you posted a crappy graph that was gibberish and did not make any logical sense. You delude yourself into believing everyone else that saw it that didn't understand it were just intellectually inferior to you.
    No, it was just Gibberish.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    Neither of the two to which you refer were answering to my proof, they were answering to their own preconceptions. You yourself are a fraud, and incompetent analyst with only the minimum knowledge of physics for sociologists, as is obvious from your responses.
    ...... Says the guy...
    -Who thinks that the constant "c" is a variable...
    -Tries to apply the Time Dilation equation to it...
    -Thinks Photons are electrons...
    -Applies relativistic calculations to non-relativistic systems and vice versa...
    There are a lot of things that I don't have a clue about. I certainly don't have all-encompassing knowledge. Not even close. You are correct in saying that on this board, mathematically, I am one of the weakest.
    I don't know how the boosters for the space shuttle were fueled. Not a clue how they did that.
    Show me the shuttles engine schematic? I'll just stare at it slack-jawed. And I mean, I'm good with engines!
    When I speak on a topic here, I try to make sure it's something I know a bit about, though. To ensure I do not give the incorrect information. To be useful.
    But you?

    You just make it up as you go along and use misuse terms in wording that you think makes you Look Smart. You mash formulas together that are not complimentary- they Do Not Work That Way. You use mathematical symbols to spout gibberish. Your posts are chock-full of misconceptions, backwards thinking, flaws, preconceptions and drip with personal Self Interest and Bias.
    And when someone has the Horrible Audacity to correct one of your many erroneous statements, you lose your shit. You blow your top. You cannot Stand It.

    You call me a fraud? You claimed you studied under Kip Thornes Graduate Students back before he had gotten his doctorate. You keep trying to wait that one to blow over but I'm not gonna let it. You're a Liar. A Liar exposed many times, at this point.

    You exhibit some of the very worst aspects of the Human Ego. Your illusion of caring about mathematical sciences is dispelled by your accusations, projections, lies and Bias. You are Disgusting. You attack the credentials of Real Scientists and spread Misinformation about theory using deception and Crankery.
    There is no lowest depth you won't stoop to in order to protect your deceptions. And the worst of all; you firmly believe that you are entitled to silence anyone that refutes that absolute Bullshit you slather out there for people to read.
    You promote Ignorance. You are no better than those people that try to have the teaching of evolution banned in schools. If you have any difficulty promoting your ludicrous beliefs, you try to undermine and silence those that promote rationality and education.
    People like YOU were the inspiration for the Quote in my signature line that you love to mock. You hypocritically mock it while you act out in the very fashion it seeks to prevent. The oppressive Silencing of disagreement.

    That is why you are Here, Chuck. This is the freest and most forgiving Science Forum on the web. It's your last bastion. It's the only place that will tolerate you. You cannot go to any other forum: You are banned from all the rest. And that quote in my sig line that you like to claim is a farce is why you are here. Because while this forum may be Small and Underpopulated... it Stands Tall for what Science is About. That you are so wrong in your claims is not relevant to you being permitted the Right To Say it.
    You have the right to say it and to argue it- as does Everyone Else, you know, those people you insult and try to "kick out" of "your" threads.
    You have the right to say it. You have the right to be an asshole. And you exercise those rights vigorously.
    emperorzelos likes this.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  4. #24
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: BuleriaChk vs. Neverfly

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    I DID NOT START THIS THREAD; I is a despicable move by a FUCKED and incompetent moderatior.
    Last edit to post was--Last edited by BuleriaChk; Today at 09:34 AM.
    Original Post date: 10-29-2016, 01:27 PM

    Says the guy that claims that he doesn't edit Old Posts and only edits some posts to correct spelling and grammar.

    What a Liar.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    I've attended graduate school at UCSB and worked for years in the industry. I'm still in good standing if I ever decided to go back.... (but very expensive these days...)

    I've been around bright people. The Peanut Gallery is definitely not. And I was the one who finally showed why John Gabriel's "new derivative" was inconsistent with the concept of slope and curvature ... None of the rest of you had a clue....

    Neither of the two to which you refer were answering to my proof, they were answering to their own preconceptions. You yourself are a fraud, and incompetent analyst with only the minimum knowledge of physics for sociologists, as is obvious from your responses.
    Hey Dipshit, you are still not a fucking mathematician and and have no clue how to do mathematics! We all showed why Gabriels shit was stupid, it resulted in division by 0 and much else.

    I am superior in mathematics to you, I am getting a Ph.D in it, are you? Do you even have a masters in mathematics?

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: Fermat's last, and mine too.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    You're being foolish. Read my post again. And stop with the fricken one-liners about concepts you don't understand.

    Turns out that Gentzen is a finitist philosophically; his approach is based on primitive recursive arithmetic. That assumes that primitive mathematical objects exist a priori, some think like Wittgenstein in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus in response to Russell's Principia (others, with whom I agree, think that work is laying the foundations for the Philosophical Investigations and Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.)

    It is becoming ever more clear that you have very little understanding of the foundations of mathematics. The Naked Emperor has a very limited understanding of only one school of thought and no others....
    .
    I have a vastely superior knowledge to you, yah moron. This has been demonstrateed time and time again by me bitchslapping you with things you do not understand and your constant usage of things that makes no mathematical sense.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •