Tab Content
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:26 AM
    Galileo and Newton use the word "velocity" in very different contexts.... And Einstein very different from the two of those guys as well.... It...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:02 AM
    Neverfly wants to set t=1 always in the equation x=ct..... :) (so the speed of light doesn't change...) Someday he'll figure out what Einstein...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-21-2017, 12:56 PM
    You are a Village Idiot with little understanding of physics or math beyond high school level. (How is the Lorentz transform related to the vector...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-21-2017, 10:22 AM
    Well, ok, my bad. There is the one dimensional vectors space and the null vector. Doesn't mean Descartes and Cartesian spaces of more than one...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-21-2017, 08:43 AM
    Modules are completely irrelevant in the context of both Fermat's Theorem and the Binomial Theorem Proof of Fermat's theorem doesn't need them,...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-21-2017, 08:37 AM
    BuleriaChk replied to a thread Dimensions in Math
    That's why I avoid modules. Proof of Fermat's theorem doesn't need them, only vector spaces. Fermat's theorem is lacking a multiplicative product. ...
    1 replies | 36 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-20-2017, 10:38 PM
    Updated document, showing role of relativistic analysis more clearly in generating the independent basis vectors for the plane (a,b), and...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 09:49 PM
    Says the Village Idiot who has no idea what either the Time Dilation or a Photon really means, much less the set {c,v,t,t'}.
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 07:21 PM
    Not for normal people. Village Idiots in the Peanut Gallery do it all the time. Especially those who don't understand vector spaces, or even...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 05:32 PM
    Added a section for Astrophysicists to the FLT proof 03/19/2017 3:09 PM PST
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 05:28 PM
    (minor edit of mine to clarify "comparision" which is totally unnecessary: Grapes omitted "a \bot b in the pair (a,b)." which emphasizes the vector...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 01:43 PM
    Nah, I've presented the proof in so many other places in my pdf and on this forum, that the context is clear, and I don't consider any elements a,b,c...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 12:49 PM
    The context is clear (well, ok, probably not to you); I am comparing the Pythagorean Triangle to the Binomial Expansion, not equating them. ...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 11:37 AM
    The dot product applies to Pythagorean triples for the case n=2. NOT for n>2 in the context of positive integers. If the vectors are not orthogonal...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 10:51 AM
    Doesn't invalidate the proof at all. The proof specifies n>2. The dot product is only valid for {a}^{1} \cdot b}^{1}=0 for the Pythagorean...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-19-2017, 09:16 AM
    Hey, you may be on to something, Dick Tracy.. (That is why c can never be an integer unless it is part of a Pythagorean Triple.... in the general...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-18-2017, 10:53 PM
    {c}^{2}\vec{r} = {a}^{2 }( \vec{i}\cdot \vec{i}) + {b}^{2 }(\vec{j}\cdot\vec{j}) + 2ab|\vec{i}\otimes\vec{j}| 1\vec{i}\cdot 1\vec{i} = {1}^{2...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-18-2017, 06:21 PM
    The dot product is zero only if there is no interaction (multiplication) - 2ab=2(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})=0) (i.e. (a+ib)(a-ib) = {a}^{2} + {b}^{2 } ...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-18-2017, 02:05 PM
    No shit, Dick Tracy. (check the cross product where a and b commute in my pdf).... Now all you have to do is imagine n>2....
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-18-2017, 10:06 AM
    John Gabriel was wrong in a very fundamental way (pre-calculus, analytic geometry), which I showed in my "toast" post in this forum (no one else did...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-17-2017, 11:58 PM
    John Gabriel was far more intelligent and knowledgeable than anyone in the Peanut Gallery, none of whom had any idea what his perspective was, or why...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-17-2017, 11:51 PM
    Added a section to the FLT proof to clarify the interaction term for the case n=2 (if it hadn't been clear already), and extended the discussion to...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-17-2017, 04:35 PM
    I really respect John Gabriel. He was wrong in his definition of a "new calculus" (e.g., the derivative), but his intuition was correct in terms of...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-17-2017, 02:23 PM
    \vec{a}=a\vec{i} \vec{b}=b\vec{j} ------------------------------- case n=2 -------------- ab=0 (Pythagorean Triple ...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-17-2017, 09:01 AM
    FLT Document updated 03/17/2017 Showing the relation of STR to the establishment of basis vectors in a Cartesian coordinate system (a,b), (x,y) or...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-15-2017, 02:05 PM
    Updated FLT Updates, with diagrams showing how the charge-to-mass ratio is represented in STR, and also the relation of rem(a,b,n) to the...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-14-2017, 09:43 PM
    You have no idea what the theory of relativity really means and can only cut and paste the time dilation equation without understanding how it was...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-14-2017, 04:57 PM
    For those who have intelligent and relevant ideas. That leaves you out. It may not be my thread (ever since you transferred to astrotech, who...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-14-2017, 03:45 PM
    You continually refer to "c=a+b" instead of \vec{r}=\vec{c}=\vec{a}+\vec{b} And I called you on it again, and again, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.......
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
  • BuleriaChk's Avatar
    03-14-2017, 02:53 PM
    The basis vector \vec{{1}_{a}} comes from my establishing basis vectors from STR. That is a very fundamental point, and you have no idea WTF I am...
    199 replies | 2984 view(s)
More Activity
About Jason me

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
222
Posts Per Day
0.37
General Information
Last Activity
02-26-2017 02:33 AM
Join Date
08-09-2015
Referrals
0

1 Friend

  1. BuleriaChk BuleriaChk is offline

    Senior Member

    BuleriaChk
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1