- Tab Content
- Jason me's Activity
- About Me
- Friends

- Older Activity
- Yesterday, 09:26 AMGalileo and Newton use the word "velocity" in very different contexts.... And Einstein very different from the two of those guys as well.... It...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- Yesterday, 09:02 AMNeverfly wants to set t=1 always in the equation x=ct..... :) (so the speed of light doesn't change...) Someday he'll figure out what Einstein...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-21-2017, 12:56 PMYou are a Village Idiot with little understanding of physics or math beyond high school level. (How is the Lorentz transform related to the vector...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-21-2017, 10:22 AMWell, ok, my bad. There is the one dimensional vectors space and the null vector. Doesn't mean Descartes and Cartesian spaces of more than one...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-21-2017, 08:43 AMModules are completely irrelevant in the context of both Fermat's Theorem and the Binomial Theorem Proof of Fermat's theorem doesn't need them,...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-21-2017, 08:37 AMThat's why I avoid modules. Proof of Fermat's theorem doesn't need them, only vector spaces. Fermat's theorem is lacking a multiplicative product. ...1 replies | 36 view(s)
- 03-20-2017, 10:38 PMUpdated document, showing role of relativistic analysis more clearly in generating the independent basis vectors for the plane (a,b), and...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 09:49 PMSays the Village Idiot who has no idea what either the Time Dilation or a Photon really means, much less the set {c,v,t,t'}.199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 07:21 PMNot for normal people. Village Idiots in the Peanut Gallery do it all the time. Especially those who don't understand vector spaces, or even...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 05:32 PMAdded a section for Astrophysicists to the FLT proof 03/19/2017 3:09 PM PST199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 05:28 PM(minor edit of mine to clarify "comparision" which is totally unnecessary: Grapes omitted "a \bot b in the pair (a,b)." which emphasizes the vector...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 01:43 PMNah, I've presented the proof in so many other places in my pdf and on this forum, that the context is clear, and I don't consider any elements a,b,c...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 12:49 PMThe context is clear (well, ok, probably not to you); I am comparing the Pythagorean Triangle to the Binomial Expansion, not equating them. ...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 11:37 AMThe dot product applies to Pythagorean triples for the case n=2. NOT for n>2 in the context of positive integers. If the vectors are not orthogonal...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 10:51 AMDoesn't invalidate the proof at all. The proof specifies n>2. The dot product is only valid for {a}^{1} \cdot b}^{1}=0 for the Pythagorean...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-19-2017, 09:16 AMHey, you may be on to something, Dick Tracy.. (That is why c can never be an integer unless it is part of a Pythagorean Triple.... in the general...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-18-2017, 10:53 PM{c}^{2}\vec{r} = {a}^{2 }( \vec{i}\cdot \vec{i}) + {b}^{2 }(\vec{j}\cdot\vec{j}) + 2ab|\vec{i}\otimes\vec{j}| 1\vec{i}\cdot 1\vec{i} = {1}^{2...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-18-2017, 06:21 PMThe dot product is zero only if there is no interaction (multiplication) - 2ab=2(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})=0) (i.e. (a+ib)(a-ib) = {a}^{2} + {b}^{2 } ...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-18-2017, 02:05 PMNo shit, Dick Tracy. (check the cross product where a and b commute in my pdf).... Now all you have to do is imagine n>2....199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-18-2017, 10:06 AMJohn Gabriel was wrong in a very fundamental way (pre-calculus, analytic geometry), which I showed in my "toast" post in this forum (no one else did...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-17-2017, 11:58 PMJohn Gabriel was far more intelligent and knowledgeable than anyone in the Peanut Gallery, none of whom had any idea what his perspective was, or why...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-17-2017, 11:51 PMAdded a section to the FLT proof to clarify the interaction term for the case n=2 (if it hadn't been clear already), and extended the discussion to...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-17-2017, 04:35 PMI really respect John Gabriel. He was wrong in his definition of a "new calculus" (e.g., the derivative), but his intuition was correct in terms of...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-17-2017, 02:23 PM\vec{a}=a\vec{i} \vec{b}=b\vec{j} ------------------------------- case n=2 -------------- ab=0 (Pythagorean Triple ...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-17-2017, 09:01 AMFLT Document updated 03/17/2017 Showing the relation of STR to the establishment of basis vectors in a Cartesian coordinate system (a,b), (x,y) or...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-15-2017, 02:05 PMUpdated FLT Updates, with diagrams showing how the charge-to-mass ratio is represented in STR, and also the relation of rem(a,b,n) to the...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-14-2017, 09:43 PMYou have no idea what the theory of relativity really means and can only cut and paste the time dilation equation without understanding how it was...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-14-2017, 04:57 PMFor those who have intelligent and relevant ideas. That leaves you out. It may not be my thread (ever since you transferred to astrotech, who...199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-14-2017, 03:45 PMYou continually refer to "c=a+b" instead of \vec{r}=\vec{c}=\vec{a}+\vec{b} And I called you on it again, and again, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.......199 replies | 2984 view(s)
- 03-14-2017, 02:53 PMThe basis vector \vec{{1}_{a}} comes from my establishing basis vectors from STR. That is a very fundamental point, and you have no idea WTF I am...199 replies | 2984 view(s)

About Jason me #### Basic Information

- Total Posts
- 222

- Posts Per Day
- 0.37

- Last Activity
- 02-26-2017 02:33 AM

- Join Date
- 08-09-2015

- Referrals
- 0