Welcome to the Space Time and the Universe.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    tom
    tom is offline
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,234
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Naked Singularities?

    The event horizon of a black hole is the point of no return. If anything, even light, strays within the bounds of this gravitational trap, it will never escape. The event horizon is what makes a black hole black.
    But say if there was a way to remove the event horizon, leaving just the black hole’s singularity to be “seen” by the rest of the universe? What if there is a special condition that would allow this infinitely small, yet massive point to become naked?
    Generally physicists agree that this is a physical impossibility, but the mathematics says otherwise; a naked singularity could be possible.
    One “special condition” was investigated when an extreme black hole collision was simulated by a Caltech researcher. In this case, the black hole pair was smashed together, head-on, at a velocity close to the speed of light. The gravitational waves travelling away from the collision were then modelled and characterized. It turns out that after this insanely energetic impact, 14% of the total mass was converted into gravitational wave energy and both black holes merged as one.
    While this might not be very realistic, it proved to be a very useful diagnostic tool to understand the conditions after the collision of two black holes. As an interesting observation, the Caltech researchers found that although the collision was extreme, and there was a huge amount of mass-energy conversion going on (plus, I’d imagine, a rather big explosion), neither black hole lost their event horizons.
    Case closed, wouldn’t you think?
    Actually, another theory as to how a black hole could be stripped naked has been knocking around for some time; what if you added mass to a black hole spinning at its maximum possible rate? Could the black hole be disrupted enough to shed its event horizon?
    It turns out there’s a natural braking system that prevents this from happening. As soon as mass is dropped into the black hole, it is flung out of the event horizon by the black hole’s huge centrifugal force, preventing it from coming close to the singularity.
    However, Ted Jacobson and Thomas Sotiriou at the University of Maryland at College Park have now improved upon this idea, sending mass in the same direction as the spinning black hole. Only this time, the black hole isn’t spinning at its fastest possible rate, the simulation lets the orbiting matter fall into the event horizon, speeding up its spin. The result? It appears to disrupt the black hole enough to strip away the event horizon, exposing the singularity.
    The most interesting thing to come of this research is that swirling matter is falling into black holes all over the universe, speeding up their spin. Jacobson and Sotiriou may have stumbled on a viable mechanism that actually allows naked singularities in the cosmos. Unless nature has found another way to prevent the cosmic censorship hypothesis from being violated that is…

    From:
    The Naked Singularity Recipe: Spin a Black Hole, Add Mass | Astroengine.com

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    Posts
    125
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Naked Singularities?

    i read this article and i thought it mentioned in the cons that the spinning mass[spinning the same direction as the black hole ] would be ejected before falling in?
    "the memories of a man in his old age are the deeds of a man in his prime"

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Naked Singularities?

    What you are talking about is over-extreme Kerr black holes.
    It turns out that there is a certain angular momentum/mass ratio above which the singularity is in fact naked. However it also turns out that you cannot overcome this limit, spacetime curves in such way around such an extremal kerr black hole that anything that would add to its angular momentum would be indeed prohibited from reaching the black hole. You can find some more information on this if you look up the "penrose process".

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    72

    Default Re: Naked Singularities?

    it's probably the fact that i have no idea what the math behind it is, but the idea that a black hole could lose it's event horizon doesnt make sense to me. If a black hole loses it's event horizon, I'd think, that it must mean it lost gravitational pull for a moment. I dont see how speeding it up would stop light from being trapped in a gravity well. I would think it just speeds up.....and the event horizon becomes that much bigger due to the added mass....i think any light coming from the black hole would be too distorted to "see" the singularity...


    If photons are mass-less how are they affected by centrifugal force?

    Also if a black hole loses photons....does it lose mass?.
    Last edited by Joe McCarron; 07-18-2011 at 05:31 PM.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •