Welcome to the Space Time and the Universe.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default Mars Colonization

    Due to recent technological advancements such as: the Ion drive, Robotics, and Solar power, why arent we as a planet, trying to get to Mars? I understand that the ion drive hasn't been fully tested in space, but if we really worked hard couldn't reach interplanetary colonization by 2030?

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Knoxville, Tn.
    Posts
    6

    Default Re: Mars Colonization

    Could, but who's going to pay for the Trillion dollar price tag? Plus what benefit would it serve? I do think we do have a responsibility as an advanced species to colonize other planets or moons, but.... outside the solar system. Preferrable a much younger more stable system. We may be the only chance for spreading life in this part of the galaxy.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    67
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Mars Colonization

    I've asked myself this a lot. I think that most of the world is preoccupied with what's happening here on the ground and believes that it's more important than whatever happens in space, so they haven't really given much thought to more long-term goals, such as interplanetary or even interstellar colonization. So, agencies such as NASA and the ESA aren't taken seriously because most people don't think that space travel is important, and they get less money to actually try anything to prove that interplanetary travel is worth the trillion-dollar price tag. I believe that colonization on Mars by 2030 is possible, but not many people see why.
    Last edited by Jimmy Pelletier; 10-16-2010 at 08:37 PM.
    Paige: "I need a f*cking cigarette!"
    Me: "Why? What's wrong with a regular one?"

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Mars Colonization

    All this would be extremely expensive and with the failing economy of many countries in the world, this is the last place money is likely to be spent.

    But Mars isn't exactly habitable, the temperature isn't too bad (coldest recorded is around -200F, highest is around 60F) but there is nothing blocking the Sun's radiation, that may be the largest hurdle along with having to create a constant supply of oxygen on a planet that is 95% Carbon Dioxide.

    Even then, what would be the purpose? It would take thousands, maybe millions of years to successfully teraform the planet into something hospitable.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    67
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Mars Colonization

    Quote Originally Posted by stereobot View Post
    Then, what would be the purpose? It would take thousands, maybe millions of years to successfully teraform the planet into something hospitable.
    Well, maybe we don't need to terraform Mars right when we get there?

    The main reason that everyone is so exited about Mars colonization is not to transform the planet into a second Earth; it's because we will learn an enormous amount about how to survive in space, how to travel through space, how to protect humans from radiation, and many other things that may help us to extend our reach to other (more habitable) planets. For example, Skylab, Mir and the International Space Station haven't generated much scientific data from onboard experiments; rather, they taught astronauts, engineers, and scientists how to deal with weightlessness, radiation, system failures, accidents, and other things that enrich our knowledge of how to survive in space.
    Paige: "I need a f*cking cigarette!"
    Me: "Why? What's wrong with a regular one?"

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •