Results 21 to 30 of 703

- 08-11-2016, 09:01 PM #21

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

Last edited by BuleriaChk; 08-11-2016 at 09:06 PM.

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 08-11-2016, 09:23 PM #22
## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

- 08-11-2016, 09:34 PM #23

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 08-11-2016, 10:08 PM #24
## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

- 08-12-2016, 01:10 AM #25

- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 564

## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

I can only say that this is not even wrong. There is nothing even remotely correct in your attempt of a proof. This is on the level of Gabriel kind of idiocy. You are so severely inept in reason, proof and rational thought that you have nothing but incoherency in your attempt here. You establishes no relations that you try to demonstrate, absolutely nothing. This isn't a proof even worthy of highschool students as many of them out do you.

If you want to know how a proof is done, either read a book or read my posts where I make them, they are properly done. If you were one of my students comming with that when you are NOT younger than 18, I'd be laughing and asking if you are serious. This is nothing short of pointless rambling by a lunatic with delusions of grandure. Thinking with your infantile understanding of mathematics you could possibly get an Abels prize and solve one of the most difficult mathematical questions in less than one page is nothing short of hubris.Last edited by emperorzelos; 08-12-2016 at 01:15 AM.

- 08-12-2016, 02:45 AM #26
## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

I see now that you've "fixed" your first post by jumping out of it to post #12 (which is now quoted by

**empororzelos**)

My objections to your attempts have nothing to do with confusion over whether the theorem is true or false.

You seem to be focusing on trying to shoehorn the theorem into the binomial form , where rem(a,b) represents the other terms of the binomial expansion)

BUT

We know that c cannot be (a+b), nor similarly can c^{n}be (a+b)^{n}

That means your approach is irrelevant to the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

- 08-12-2016, 04:50 AM #27

- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 564

- 08-12-2016, 06:03 AM #28
## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

What you have proved, is that (a+b)

^{n}cannot equal a^{n}+b^{n}, except when n=1, but

you have not proven that (a+b-1)^{n}cannot equal a^{n}+b^{n}

nor have you proven that (a+b-2)^{n}cannot equal a^{n}+b^{n}. In fact, we know it can, for n=2, but not for any other n

- 08-12-2016, 01:07 PM #29

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

_______________________________________

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

- 08-12-2016, 01:08 PM #30

- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 2,766

## Re: Fermat's Theorem, revisited

Last edited by BuleriaChk; 08-12-2016 at 01:11 PM.

"Flamenco Chuck" Keyser

The Relativistic Unit Circle**03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST**

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates**03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST**

**Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.**

## Bookmarks