Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,766

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    You really have no idea what the Fermi energy is, do you?

    Or even Fermi level?

    Oh, I forgot you don't have to, since you believe in "c"...
    Who is everywhere, observing, invisible, and is writing down all your sins....
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 10-30-2016 at 06:55 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle 03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  2. #12
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    You really have no idea what the Fermi energy is, do you?

    Or even Fermi level?

    Oh, I forgot you don't have to, since you believe in "c"...
    Who is everywhere, observing, invisible, and is writing down all your sins....
    Claiming that the pointing out of definitions is synonymous with faith based religion would render all of science and mathematics a religion. Your argument is absurd.

    Additionally, your comments about Fermi Energy are off topic. It has nothing whatsoever to do with whether a mathematical constant is constant.
    And your whole argument is off topic- it has nothing whatsoever to do with the OP, other than you slathering your ill-informed and heavy misconceptions on every thread across the forums.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,766

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    Claiming that the pointing out of definitions is synonymous with faith based religion would render all of science and mathematics a religion. Your argument is absurd.

    Additionally, your comments about Fermi Energy are off topic. It has nothing whatsoever to do with whether a mathematical constant is constant.
    And your whole argument is off topic- it has nothing whatsoever to do with the OP, other than you slathering your ill-informed and heavy misconceptions on every thread across the forums.
    The idea that a mathematical constant as an absolute constant (independent of measurement) has anything to do with physics is absurd, given the Uncertainty Principle.

    The whole point of STR is assigning a mass equivalent length (rather than a distance) to a coordinate system. It upsets our intuitive ideas of space and time (in which the speed of light is instantaneous, and one feels a sunburn, but not his own radiation).... and thus requires a precise analysis of concepts like simultaneity (and negative and complex numbers - especially vis a vis the Pauli and Dirac equations which are fundamental to QFT)..

    (There IS a difference between Galilean coordinates (Newton's laws/Maxwell's equations) and a space-time diagram (STR) (ultimately resulting in the vector potential and the Electromagnetic Field Tensor) that you haven't even begun to understand yet.... You're still in baby-steps trying to extrapolate your limited knowledge to some of the most profound concepts of physics by using analogies from popular science, and until you understand the difference, you will never be able to play with the big boys.....

    Whoever made you a moderator was profoundly misguided..... the reason you think my posts are off-topic is that you are an ignorant fool of a scientific amateur...
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 10-31-2016 at 12:04 AM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle 03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  4. #14
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    The idea that a mathematical constant as an absolute constant (independent of measurement) has anything to do with physics is absurd, given the Uncertainty Principle.
    It is interesting that you always subtly change the claim when confronted.
    Who said anything about being independent of measurement?
    No one did. Well, except you, as you shift the goal posts in order to present the illusion of a podium to approach...

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post
    the reason you think my posts are off-topic is that you are an ignorant fool of a scientific amateur...
    You make plenty of claims, BuleriaChk... which you either leave unsupported, personally attack anyone that challenges your assumptions or you "support" with smart-looking nonsensical gobbledygook. You regularly ignore rebuttals and even later try to claim they never even happened at all. Your mathematical posts almost never follow, often make little sense, either from a physics standpoint or a mathematical standpoint. They usually look copy pasted, as if you snagged little bits from here and there, and then tried to claim they mesh together, somehow, if only the reader had the intellect to understand it. More often than not, the links you cite contradict your claims. Or they neither support nor refute; just have nothing to do with the topic like you bringing up Pauli in discussing Fermats Last Theorem.
    You're an illusionist.

    I have been tolerant and patient with you for years... I have even defended you, though you did little to deserve it.
    Perhaps the worst thing that ever happened to you was John Gabriel opting out of further posting. The lack of his distractions has turned all eyes on you.
    Either way, I do not care if you think I'm an idiot or a terrible forum janitor... Your posts look to be nothing more than you re-initializing old arguments and debates that are not related to this topic.
    You can choose to either outline how your posts answer the questions in the O.P. or they will be moved to the ATM forum where you can defend your ATM claims of a variable constant until your face turns blue.
    emperorzelos likes this.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  5. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    807

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    "You can choose to either outline how your posts answer the questions in the O.P. or they will be moved to the ATM forum where you can defend your ATM claims of a variable constant until your face turns blue."

    I would just like to reiterate this also ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    The whole point of this thread is to encourage discussions, throw in a few ideas (within mainstream science) and maybe answer a few questions regarding the creation of the universe.

    The intention being to encourage new and existing members to discuss science, from the layman to the professor, but in a manner to which most will understand and appreciate.

    This could be a good forum if it was given a chance.

    Please respect this.

    Thanks David

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,766

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    For Einstein, mass of an existing particle (or the Universe) is proportional to curvature:






    Let (it can be multiplied by any scaling factor depending on the units selected as long as it remains positive.) T

    Then:



    If r goes to zero, the dimension doesn’t exist, so there is no fraction, and



    Hint for student: What happens if the proportionality constant is set to 0 so that?



    If equality does not apply, then what is the reason?

    Finally: what is the nature of r?

    Is it a measure of space in which? where c is a velocity?

    Or is it a measure of mass such that where c is a mass creation rate.

    What happens if

    (For Einstein, the mass is that of light, and space-time is irrelevant. Observed gravitational effects are seen at the center of the light cone, and such effects are observed on photographic plates after photons have interacted with real lenses in real optical systems.)

    That is why the concept of "space-time" is irrelevant to Special Theory of Relativity, but is relevant if interpreted as light density; This is easily seen if one deconstructs v/c (See the "Creation of the Universe" on my website.)

    The Special Theory of Relativity has been confirmed, and is the foundation of the Standard Model (together with the symmetries involved).. Neverfly's position is that light has no mass (which is wrong even if you only accept Newton and Maxwell - and his attempt to couch it in Maxwell's results by only including B is referring everything the permeability constant, but do not include the E field. It completely ignores the D and H fields, which are application of the conceptual models to matter with density, also verified in countless experiments, especially with respect to refraction (diffraction is due to the physical interaction between photons and the lattice structure of a crystal; energy deposition is due to interaction with the potentials in matter modeled by solid state physics - the latter theory is built on the results of Einstein, Dirac, and Feynman's models....

    Space and time are only relevant to classical physics, and only interpreting light as a density in STR. (Quantum mechanics rests on STR by introducing h - the photoelectric constant of a single electron. It is well known that the effective mass of electrons changes within matter, especially in semiconductors, and is an expression of the Fermi level for conductors relative to the ground state (or "vacuum" which is never 0, but the lowest reference energy point of the physical system under analysis.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle 03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    2,766

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    In particular, Neverfly seems to only have the concept of geometric optics in mind, where a change in velocity is irrelevant to a geometric path along a straight geodesic. The problem is the geometric optics (as geometry only) takes no account of spin polarization (which is responsible for the physical interaction of light within the lattice structure of a lens or prism (refraction), and is responsible for its "losing energy" or "slowing down", depending on which model and/or medium one is invoking/comparing.

    I have already shown that STR is not relevant to classical quantum mechanical waves in a previous post in this thread where only the rest mass ct is under consideration; in QFT, the classical "wave" equation is replaced by a Dirac delta impulse (mass impulse) that acts on the vacuum for light represented as a linear system (representing symmetries) together with the corresponding Greens' function (impulse response).
    Last edited by BuleriaChk; 11-02-2016 at 05:32 PM.
    _______________________________________
    "Flamenco Chuck" Keyser
    The Relativistic Unit Circle 03/28/2017 07:40 AM PST
    Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem Updates 03/19/2017 8:23 PM PST
    Ignore List -The Peanut Gallery.

  8. #18
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Quote Originally Posted by BuleriaChk View Post

    (For Einstein, the mass is that of light, and space-time is irrelevant. Observed gravitational effects are seen at the center of the light cone, and such effects are observed on photographic plates after photons have interacted with real lenses in real optical systems.)

    That is why the concept of "space-time" is irrelevant to Special Theory of Relativity, but is relevant if interpreted as light density; This is easily seen if one deconstructs v/c (See the "Creation of the Universe" on my website.)

    The Special Theory of Relativity has been confirmed, and is the foundation of the Standard Model (together with the symmetries involved).. Neverfly's position is that light has no mass (which is wrong even if you only accept Newton and Maxwell - and his attempt to couch it in Maxwell's results by only including B is referring everything the permeability constant, but do not include the E field. It completely ignores the D and H fields, which are application of the conceptual models to matter with density, also verified in countless experiments, especially with respect to refraction (diffraction is due to the physical interaction between photons and the lattice structure of a crystal; energy deposition is due to interaction with the potentials in matter modeled by solid state physics - the latter theory is built on the results of Einstein, Dirac, and Feynman's models....

    Space and time are only relevant to classical physics, and only interpreting light as a density in STR. (Quantum mechanics rests on STR by introducing h - the photoelectric constant of a single electron. It is well known that the effective mass of electrons changes within matter, especially in semiconductors, and is an expression of the Fermi level for conductors relative to the ground state (or "vacuum" which is never 0, but the lowest reference energy point of the physical system under analysis.

    and for massless radiation:


    According to the current standard model, light has no mass. This is not "Neverfly's position," it is the current mainstream model and most of us already know this.
    What is the mass of a photon?
    Now, most of what BuleriaChk said above is accurate, in STR, light is treated as Density and Spacetime is not relevant. For that, we need General Relativity.
    Which brings us to the Standard Model and Chucks claim about light having mass, where again, he's actually pretty accurate.
    What if you were to build a box with perfect mirrors and trap light inside of the box so that it is reflecting in both directions symmetrically?

    In such a case, the total momentum relative to the box is zero, but the total energy is not. Light adds a very small amount of mass to the total system.
    But this does not mean that photons or beams of light have mass. It means that we have an argument about whether Invariant or Relativistic mass was considered when doing the calculation, or not.
    If relativistic mass is used, then mass is conserved and the sum total is equal to the parts involved. But if invariant mass is used for the box, as is commonly used in physics for ease of calculation, then you will end up not conserving mass since relativistic momentum is used for the photon.

    ... Which leads us to Einsteins most famous equation;
    In STR, mass and energy are equivalent. Chucks claim that Einstein was saying light has mass is wrong.
    Last edited by Neverfly; 11-02-2016 at 06:36 PM.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    222

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Neverfly. Light when its still is how u see it but nothing escapes travel. The travel/drag causes light to have mass becuse it goes through space-time-gravity. Its massless state becomes an actual weitht. It slows as it travels. No?? Pls think bf u respond.
    Last edited by Jason me; 12-11-2016 at 04:26 AM.

  10. #20
    Moderator Neverfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Utopia Planetia, Mars
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: Theory Of Everything (TOE)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason me View Post
    Light when its still is how u see it but nothing escapes travel.
    What? Are these Mad-Libs?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason me View Post
    The travel/drag causes light to have mass becuse it goes through space-time-gravity.
    Where is your support for this conclusion?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason me View Post
    Its massless state becomes an actual weitht.
    What?
    Do you read what you post to see if it makes sense before hitting "submit?"
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason me View Post
    It slows as it travels. No??
    No, it does not.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason me View Post
    Pls think bf u respond.
    ... Really!? Go back and read whatever it was you were trying to say and then come back and ask me to 'think before I respond' again.
    Jason me likes this.
    --Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges--
    “Science needs the light of free expression to flourish. It depends on the fearless questioning of authority, and the open exchange of ideas.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson

    "When photons interact with electrons, they are interacting with the charge around a "bare" mass, and thus the interaction is electromagnetic, hence light. This light slows the photon down." - BuleriaChk

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •